40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
165.94%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x PR's 111.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
13.17%
D&A growth well above PR's 12.30%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-98.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PR stands at 51.54%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-132.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with PR at -0.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
87.10%
Slight usage while PR is negative at -322.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
97.78%
AR growth while PR is negative at -92.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.43%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -100.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-228.57%
Both negative yoy, with PR at -275.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
3.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of PR's 7.38%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
0.20%
Some CapEx rise while PR is negative at -54.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-22.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
95.09%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. PR's 3396.28%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-2.58%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 3.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-4.76%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 66.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.