PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
237.14%
Net income growth at 50-75% of PR's 322.58%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
41.11%
D&A growth well above PR's 16.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
354.84%
Well above PR's 361.95% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-136.96%
Negative yoy SBC while PR is 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-62.71%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PR is 191.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-132.76%
AR is negative yoy while PR is 78.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.71%
Negative yoy usage while PR is 124.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
51.02%
Some yoy increase while PR is negative at -74.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
71.27%
Operating cash flow growth similar to PR's 77.34%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-1.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while PR is 1.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-120.27%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-155.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -99.18%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-30.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -9.49%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-2505.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 94.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -14.09%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.