PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-55.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PR at -119.54%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.44%
D&A growth well above PR's 0.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.15%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
105.88%
SBC growth well above PR's 20.01%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -144.90%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
207.02%
AR growth while PR is negative at -518.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -1749.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
29.17%
Some yoy increase while PR is negative at -123.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-16.56%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PR at -41.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.53%
Some CapEx rise while PR is negative at -0.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
1073.33%
Acquisition growth of 1073.33% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-373.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while PR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-373.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 1070.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
29.31%
Investing outflow well above PR's 0.02%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
91.75%
We repay more while PR is negative at -180.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.56%
We have some buyback growth while PR is negative at -74.40%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.