40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.60%
Negative net income growth while PR stands at 79.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.83%
Less D&A growth vs. PR's 219.82%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
51.72%
Some yoy growth while PR is negative at -23.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
206.67%
Less SBC growth vs. PR's 1105.58%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-76.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while PR is 426.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
303.27%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. PR's 727.29%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-220.33%
Both negative yoy AP, with PR at -14.27%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-26.19%
Negative yoy usage while PR is 206.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2933.33%
Both negative yoy, with PR at -926.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-28.42%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 31.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7200.00%
Some acquisitions while PR is negative at -60387.61%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
750.00%
Growth well above PR's 553.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
48.64%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -362.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
52.31%
We repay more while PR is negative at -1757.14%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.74%
We cut yoy buybacks while PR is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.