40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.56%
Some net income increase while PR is negative at -42.15%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-3.78%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PR at -30.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-355.68%
Negative yoy deferred tax while PR stands at 31.05%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.87%
Less SBC growth vs. PR's 185.13%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-116.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -145.34%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-88.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PR at -207.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
141.64%
Inventory growth of 141.64% while PR is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
80.58%
A yoy AP increase while PR is negative at -21.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-116.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PR at -127.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-4.71%
Negative yoy while PR is 125.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.04%
Negative yoy CFO while PR is 36.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
29.94%
Some CapEx rise while PR is negative at -114.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-219.25%
Negative yoy acquisition while PR stands at 114.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.24%
We reduce yoy other investing while PR is 1203.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-123.86%
We reduce yoy invests while PR stands at 53.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.81%
Debt repayment above 1.5x PR's 52.31%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.15%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of PR's 81.52%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.