40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
110.84%
Net income growth at 50-75% of PR's 159.69%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
15.43%
Some D&A expansion while PR is negative at -7.70%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
240.46%
Well above PR's 385.60% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
16.67%
SBC growth while PR is negative at -44.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
163.53%
Less working capital growth vs. PR's 386.36%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
133.37%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. PR's 305.07%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PR at -179.47%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while PR is 458.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
119.78%
Growth well above PR's 204.82%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
8632.93%
Some yoy increase while PR is negative at -415.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
44.87%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of PR's 75.96%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
24.89%
Some CapEx rise while PR is negative at -48.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
234.68%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. PR's 3363.39%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-696.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -1154.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
15.20%
We have mild expansions while PR is negative at -22.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-15084.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PR is 52.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with PR at -139.85%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.