40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
56.44%
Net income growth similar to RRC's 57.27%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-5.86%
Negative yoy D&A while RRC is 17.07%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
26.83%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. RRC's 54.17%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-211.41%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RRC is 18.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.11%
Some yoy increase while RRC is negative at -3.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
32.55%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x RRC's 25.18%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
5.61%
Some CapEx rise while RRC is negative at -12.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.11%
Growth well above RRC's 180.16%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
92.75%
Investing outflow well above RRC's 84.32%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
68.49%
Debt repayment growth of 68.49% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-31.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -99.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
103.42%
Buyback growth of 103.42% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.