40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.50%
Negative net income growth while RRC stands at 13.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.85%
Negative yoy D&A while RRC is 7.96%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
89.98%
Well above RRC's 11.47% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -381.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
Some yoy usage while RRC is negative at -228.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
65.57%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RRC's 214.48%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
36.66%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RRC's 1.19%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-11.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -35.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-127.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 60.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-447.60%
We reduce yoy invests while RRC stands at 51.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-70.02%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RRC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2.34%
We slightly raise equity while RRC is negative at -98.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
50.69%
Buyback growth of 50.69% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.