PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.52%
Negative net income growth while RRC stands at 29.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.52%
D&A growth well above RRC's 0.45%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-32.86%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RRC stands at 30.91%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1999.85%
Well above RRC's 278.85% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1999.85%
Some yoy usage while RRC is negative at -219.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-206.74%
Negative yoy while RRC is 73.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-32.85%
Negative yoy CFO while RRC is 21.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
15.48%
Some CapEx rise while RRC is negative at -12.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.97%
We have some outflow growth while RRC is negative at -174.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
194.71%
We have mild expansions while RRC is negative at -22.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
46.76%
Debt repayment growth of 46.76% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
114.50%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. RRC's 567.28%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-44431.11%
We cut yoy buybacks while RRC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.