PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2316.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x RRC's 43.74%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-24.50%
Negative yoy D&A while RRC is 15472296.69%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.92%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RRC stands at 200.63%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.05%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -319.51%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above RRC's 122.40%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
4147.62%
Some yoy increase while RRC is negative at -332.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-48.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RRC at -15.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
38.21%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RRC's 95.10%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-84.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -176.44%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while RRC stands at 283.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RRC is 751.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.62%
Growth well above RRC's 123.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
155.57%
Investing outflow well above RRC's 47.85%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
52.77%
We repay more while RRC is negative at -35.34%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-50.00%
Negative yoy issuance while RRC is 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.