40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
93.57%
Net income growth under 50% of RRC's 198.38%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.55%
Negative yoy D&A while RRC is 28115806.43%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
53.71%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. RRC's 209.18%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-209.09%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RRC at -95.15%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-100.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -1128.20%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -171.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
1740.00%
Some yoy increase while RRC is negative at -247.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-37.22%
Negative yoy CFO while RRC is 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while RRC is 9.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
4380.65%
Acquisition growth of 4380.65% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
151.67%
Some yoy expansion while RRC is negative at -1.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
0.13%
Below 50% of RRC's 104.52%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-0.39%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 630.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
167.36%
Investing outflow well above RRC's 43.88%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -184.90%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.