40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
907.47%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -14.57%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
19.00%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -3.76%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
63.96%
Some yoy growth while RRC is negative at -20.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-123.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RRC at -191.81%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
30.25%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -207.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.25%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RRC's 77.12%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-196.00%
Negative yoy while RRC is 136.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.26%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RRC at -18.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-6.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while RRC is 6.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
740.95%
Acquisition spending well above RRC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
1064.52%
Some yoy expansion while RRC is negative at -292.88%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-79.82%
We reduce yoy sales while RRC is 194.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
37.16%
We have some outflow growth while RRC is negative at -102.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
355.54%
We have mild expansions while RRC is negative at -52.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
92.80%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x RRC's 71.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.