40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-23.20%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RRC at -59.11%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.21%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-66.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-230.43%
Negative yoy SBC while RRC is 2.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
19.38%
Less working capital growth vs. RRC's 131.15%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-52.86%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RRC at -90.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.57%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RRC's 147.29%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-2600.00%
Negative yoy while RRC is 127.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
105.66%
Some CFO growth while RRC is negative at -17.89%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-4.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -35.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
286.05%
Acquisition growth of 286.05% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
4.01%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. RRC's 41.26%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-56.36%
We reduce yoy sales while RRC is 8.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-4.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -100.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
19.64%
We have mild expansions while RRC is negative at -49.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RRC is 19.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.