40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
165.94%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -77.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.17%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -75.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-98.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RRC stands at 112.22%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-132.14%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RRC at -30.79%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
87.10%
Less working capital growth vs. RRC's 246.70%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
97.78%
AR growth well above RRC's 185.34%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.43%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -258.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-228.57%
Negative yoy while RRC is 110.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
3.25%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of RRC's 71.78%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
0.20%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RRC's 14.09%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-22.73%
Negative yoy acquisition while RRC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while RRC stands at 79.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.00%
We have some liquidation growth while RRC is negative at -80.26%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
95.09%
We have some outflow growth while RRC is negative at -100.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-2.58%
We reduce yoy invests while RRC stands at 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-4.76%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RRC is 93.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.