PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
237.14%
Net income growth under 50% of RRC's 8017.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
41.11%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
354.84%
Well above RRC's 604.98% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-136.96%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RRC at -102.73%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-62.71%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RRC is 9131.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-132.76%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RRC at -49.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.71%
Negative yoy usage while RRC is 73.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
51.02%
Some yoy increase while RRC is negative at -111.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
71.27%
Some CFO growth while RRC is negative at -29.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.90%
Negative yoy CapEx while RRC is 6.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-120.27%
Negative yoy acquisition while RRC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-155.56%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 13998.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-30.76%
We reduce yoy invests while RRC stands at 22.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2505.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -1118.75%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.25%
We cut yoy buybacks while RRC is 94.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.