40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-55.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RRC at -123.94%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.44%
Less D&A growth vs. RRC's 16542841.18%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-72.15%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
105.88%
Less SBC growth vs. RRC's 277.40%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -128.72%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
207.02%
AR growth while RRC is negative at -40.54%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -11.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
29.17%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RRC's 786.25%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-16.56%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RRC at -43.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.53%
CapEx growth well above RRC's 10.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
1073.33%
Acquisition growth of 1073.33% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-373.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while RRC stands at 85.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-373.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 2111.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
29.31%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. RRC's 450.15%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
91.75%
We repay more while RRC is negative at -12.35%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.56%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of RRC's 84.62%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.