40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-63.52%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RRC at -40.87%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
30.00%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -52.26%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
128.44%
Some yoy growth while RRC is negative at -37.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-129.41%
Negative yoy SBC while RRC is 64.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4540.00%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -26.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
694.58%
AR growth well above RRC's 74.10%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-862.36%
Negative yoy inventory while RRC is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.88%
Negative yoy AP while RRC is 69.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
4540.00%
Some yoy usage while RRC is negative at -1048.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
92.42%
Well above RRC's 54.92%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
22.06%
Some CFO growth while RRC is negative at -22.48%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-70.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -23.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
26.38%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. RRC's 1100.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-414.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 49.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-46.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -20.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-7000.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RRC is 67.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.13%
We cut yoy buybacks while RRC is 91.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.