40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.83%
Net income growth under 50% of RRC's 63.51%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
74.82%
D&A growth of 74.82% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-265.96%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RRC stands at 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-21.74%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RRC at -9.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-233.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RRC at -57.11%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-221.70%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RRC at -131.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
343.06%
Inventory growth of 343.06% while RRC is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
101.74%
AP growth well above RRC's 87.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-233.33%
Negative yoy usage while RRC is 44.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-30.77%
Negative yoy while RRC is 32.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
9.03%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of RRC's 18.69%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-30.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while RRC is 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
98.14%
Some acquisitions while RRC is negative at -53.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -1300.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
71.61%
Investing outflow well above RRC's 0.74%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RRC is 97.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.44%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of RRC's 82.23%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.