40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.59%
Some net income increase while RRC is negative at -68.84%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.28%
Some D&A expansion while RRC is negative at -0.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
75.62%
Some yoy growth while RRC is negative at -226.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-43.48%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RRC at -38.94%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
99.39%
Slight usage while RRC is negative at -387.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-63.37%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RRC at -128.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.65%
A yoy AP increase while RRC is negative at -246.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
77.17%
Growth well above RRC's 63.98%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-102.14%
Negative yoy while RRC is 117.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
52.98%
Some CFO growth while RRC is negative at -55.18%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with RRC at -7.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
99.02%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. RRC's 645.16%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-365.49%
We reduce yoy other investing while RRC is 111.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
17.07%
We have mild expansions while RRC is negative at -5.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
75.38%
We repay more while RRC is negative at -1189.48%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.40%
Buyback growth below 50% of RRC's 57.88%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.