PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.29%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SD's 49.88%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
6.89%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -1.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-0.42%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-400.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 54.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 54.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-5042.90%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -248.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-29.47%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 12.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-25.08%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -62.26%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-72.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -56.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-3.15%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
132.61%
Issuance growth of 132.61% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
68.97%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of SD's 100.00%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.