PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-109.77%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 49.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
94.22%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -1.17%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-154.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26204.46%
Well above SD's 54.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
410.20%
Some yoy increase while SD is negative at -248.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
50.48%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SD's 12.39%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-63.46%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
483.85%
Liquidation growth of 483.85% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
175.26%
We have some outflow growth while SD is negative at -62.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-303.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -56.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
95.25%
Debt repayment growth of 95.25% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
3.88%
Issuance growth of 3.88% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
1.88%
Buyback growth below 50% of SD's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.