40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.85%
Negative net income growth while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.84%
D&A growth of 10.84% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
28.68%
Deferred tax of 28.68% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.11%
Working capital change of 95.11% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.11%
Growth of 95.11% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-66.94%
Negative yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.36%
CFO growth of 2.36% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-39.96%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.36%
Growth of 70.36% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-37.33%
We reduce yoy invests while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-834.30%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-92.96%
Negative yoy issuance while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
68.61%
Buyback growth of 68.61% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.