PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
93.57%
Some net income increase while SD is negative at -87.37%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.55%
Negative yoy D&A while SD is 228.07%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
53.71%
Deferred tax of 53.71% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-209.09%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SD at -1.87%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-100.41%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 46.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.41%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1740.00%
Some yoy increase while SD is negative at -120.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-37.22%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 19.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -3.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
4380.65%
Acquisition spending well above SD's 200.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
151.67%
Purchases growth of 151.67% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
0.13%
Liquidation growth of 0.13% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-0.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -5448.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
167.36%
Investing outflow well above SD's 10.66%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 99.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.