PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-438.75%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SD at -77.49%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-11.24%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SD at -72.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
147.62%
Well above SD's 43.39% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
154.17%
SBC growth well above SD's 105.34%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-21400.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21400.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SD at -20.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-101.55%
Negative yoy while SD is 691.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-52.86%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SD at -38.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
8.33%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SD's 18.97%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-93.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
2206.45%
Purchases growth of 2206.45% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-80.38%
We reduce yoy sales while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
10.70%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SD's 3740.25%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-178.01%
We reduce yoy invests while SD stands at 513.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
33.33%
We repay more while SD is negative at -6197252.63%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.