PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
269.37%
Net income growth above 1.5x SD's 104.65%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.25%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SD at -10.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-267.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-146.15%
Negative yoy SBC while SD is 164.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.33%
Less working capital growth vs. SD's 257.28%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.33%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SD's 299.32%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-10.00%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -111.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
63.91%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SD's 116.72%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
10.63%
CapEx growth well above SD's 3.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
262.79%
Acquisition growth of 262.79% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-103.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
317.65%
Liquidation growth of 317.65% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
5.77%
We have some outflow growth while SD is negative at -99.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.04%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -119.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
50.00%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of SD's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.