PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
142.24%
Net income growth above 1.5x SD's 93.44%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.31%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SD at -12.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
2466.67%
Some yoy growth while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-13.64%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SD at -28.69%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
183.80%
Well above SD's 47.42% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.80%
Growth well above SD's 52.45%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-12.28%
Negative yoy while SD is 722.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.66%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 55.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while SD is 1.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-2816.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -503.78%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-112.13%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1373.68%
Liquidation growth of 1373.68% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-52.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -99.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-233.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -190.76%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
68.51%
Debt repayment growth of 68.51% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.