40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
907.47%
Net income growth under 50% of SD's 2154.37%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
19.00%
D&A growth well above SD's 12.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
63.96%
Deferred tax of 63.96% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-123.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SD at -12.63%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
30.25%
Well above SD's 55.14% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.25%
Growth well above SD's 1.83%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-196.00%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -99.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.26%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 17.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-6.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -27.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
740.95%
Acquisition spending well above SD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
1064.52%
Purchases growth of 1064.52% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-79.82%
We reduce yoy sales while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
37.16%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SD's 1315.24%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
355.54%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -20.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
92.80%
Debt repayment growth of 92.80% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.