40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-962.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SD at -466.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.33%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -75.82%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-813.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 253.51%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
94.64%
SBC growth while SD is negative at -2.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
95.74%
Slight usage while SD is negative at -346.22%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth well above SD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.74%
Some yoy usage while SD is negative at -136.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
214.46%
Well above SD's 118.80%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
84.67%
Some CFO growth while SD is negative at -60.03%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.12%
CapEx growth well above SD's 21.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
113.94%
Some acquisitions while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-14.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.95%
We reduce yoy sales while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
13.68%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SD's 105.70%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
104.06%
Investing outflow well above SD's 22.17%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
94.52%
Debt repayment growth of 94.52% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.