PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.23%
Net income growth under 50% of SD's 49.87%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-10.66%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SD at -26.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
36.21%
Deferred tax of 36.21% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-350.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SD at -51.56%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-9.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SD at -102.26%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SD at -102.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-151.72%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -50.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
52.01%
Some CFO growth while SD is negative at -81.70%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
36.34%
CapEx growth well above SD's 51.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-29.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-40.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-36.34%
We reduce yoy sales while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
32.43%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SD's 246.71%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
20.12%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SD's 60.08%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
98.86%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x SD's 86.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.