PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.49%
Net income growth above 1.5x SD's 1.57%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-21.59%
Negative yoy D&A while SD is 364.86%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
35.94%
Deferred tax of 35.94% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
80.00%
SBC growth while SD is negative at -11.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-42.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 2661.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SD at -1657.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
256.67%
Some yoy increase while SD is negative at -93.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-1.10%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SD at -69.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
40.80%
CapEx growth well above SD's 6.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
668.69%
Acquisition growth of 668.69% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-10.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.80%
We reduce yoy sales while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
40.59%
We have some outflow growth while SD is negative at -896.87%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
153.68%
We have mild expansions while SD is negative at -207.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-4166.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -0.57%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.