40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-58.58%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SD at -64.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-11.88%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SD at -7.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-49.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
314.29%
SBC growth while SD is negative at -83.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-259.32%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SD is 109.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-113.10%
AR is negative yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-259.32%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 109.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
163.89%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SD's 590.81%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-47.13%
Negative yoy CFO while SD is 114.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
40.11%
CapEx growth well above SD's 21.05%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-120.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-115.60%
Negative yoy purchasing while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1691.67%
Liquidation growth of 1691.67% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
40.11%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SD's 298.44%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
20.47%
Investing outflow well above SD's 35.62%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-93.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 91.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.