PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
663.07%
Net income growth above 1.5x SD's 39.65%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.20%
Some D&A expansion while SD is negative at -60.68%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
825.00%
Deferred tax of 825.00% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-83.33%
Negative yoy SBC while SD is 11.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
138.44%
Well above SD's 7.62% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
67.66%
AR growth of 67.66% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.13%
A yoy AP increase while SD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
112.14%
Growth well above SD's 15.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-97.64%
Negative yoy while SD is 16752.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
96.20%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SD's 45.88%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-13.30%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -11.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
78.57%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. SD's 318.64%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -2525.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-23.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -33.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1478.57%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SD is 25.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.14%
We cut yoy buybacks while SD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.