PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.56%
Net income growth under 50% of SD's 95.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-3.78%
Negative yoy D&A while SD is 182.71%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-355.68%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.87%
SBC growth well above SD's 4.77%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-116.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SD at -2317.43%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-88.00%
AR is negative yoy while SD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
141.64%
Inventory growth of 141.64% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
80.58%
AP growth of 80.58% while SD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-116.13%
Negative yoy usage while SD is 319.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-4.71%
Both negative yoy, with SD at -3491.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.04%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SD at -45.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
29.94%
CapEx growth well above SD's 32.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-219.25%
Negative yoy acquisition while SD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with SD at -31180.28%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-123.86%
We reduce yoy invests while SD stands at 31.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.81%
We repay more while SD is negative at -151.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.15%
Buyback growth below 50% of SD's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.