40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-23.47%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VTLE at -2992.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.36%
Some D&A expansion while VTLE is negative at -1.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-318.94%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 13247.43%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.02%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
637.40%
Well above VTLE's 182.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
98.00%
Some CFO growth while VTLE is negative at -28.10%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
9.45%
CapEx growth of 9.45% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.44%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -22.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
25.42%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -22.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
85.03%
Debt repayment growth of 85.03% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
746.59%
Issuance growth of 746.59% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-26.20%
We cut yoy buybacks while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.