40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
730.06%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -2992.70%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.13%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VTLE at -1.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-34.93%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 13247.43%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-202.47%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-202.47%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-226.23%
Negative yoy while VTLE is 182.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-54.38%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -28.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
3.94%
CapEx growth of 3.94% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
2126.86%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -22.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
145.10%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -22.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1910.91%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-17.39%
Negative yoy issuance while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-19.21%
We cut yoy buybacks while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.