40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.84%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -2992.70%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
9.05%
Some D&A expansion while VTLE is negative at -1.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-697.22%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 13247.43%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1315.77%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1315.77%
Growth of 1315.77% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
128.43%
Well above VTLE's 182.14%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-3.02%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -28.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-165.51%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -22.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-189.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -22.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
230.06%
Issuance growth of 230.06% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
100.86%
Buyback growth of 100.86% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.