PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
212.67%
Net income growth of 212.67% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
-0.49%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
382.89%
Deferred tax of 382.89% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.37%
Working capital change of 154.37% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
159.57%
Growth of 159.57% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
6.84%
Growth of 6.84% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
48.38%
CFO growth of 48.38% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-15.78%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
5.77%
Acquisition growth of 5.77% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
224.47%
Purchases growth of 224.47% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
15.78%
Liquidation growth of 15.78% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-18.37%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
0.47%
We expand invests by 0.47% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.