40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
125.64%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 779.49%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.16%
Less D&A growth vs. VTLE's 33.75%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
7.46%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 791.03%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.49%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -172.42%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.49%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VTLE's 606.43%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-129.91%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -160.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
52.13%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VTLE's 13.27%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
12.91%
CapEx growth well above VTLE's 13.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-182.44%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
131.88%
Purchases growth of 131.88% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-12.91%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.41%
We have some outflow growth while VTLE is negative at -57.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1.11%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. VTLE's 13.14%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
4.08%
Debt repayment well below VTLE's 80.61%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.