PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.82%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 41.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.87%
Some D&A expansion while VTLE is negative at -10.08%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
176.39%
Well above VTLE's 41.93% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -409.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Some yoy usage while VTLE is negative at -123.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-843.75%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -147.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
38.84%
Some CFO growth while VTLE is negative at -16.79%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-5.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 4.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
103.70%
Acquisition growth of 103.70% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-266.67%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.63%
Liquidation growth of 5.63% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-2.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -83.33%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-4.25%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 4.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-40.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -393.31%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.