PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
93.57%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 260.18%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.55%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 5.60%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
53.71%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 218.49%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-209.09%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VTLE at -11.31%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-100.41%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VTLE is 249.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.41%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 133.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1740.00%
Some yoy increase while VTLE is negative at -92.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-37.22%
Negative yoy CFO while VTLE is 11.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 26.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
4380.65%
Acquisition spending well above VTLE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
151.67%
Purchases growth of 151.67% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
0.13%
Liquidation growth of 0.13% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-0.39%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
167.36%
Investing outflow well above VTLE's 18.78%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.