40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-74.25%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VTLE at -64.98%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-1.52%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VTLE at -15.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
94.57%
Some yoy growth while VTLE is negative at -49.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
350.00%
SBC growth well above VTLE's 31.66%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
470.37%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -93.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
470.37%
Some yoy usage while VTLE is negative at -193.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
268.18%
Well above VTLE's 148.63%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
68.77%
Some CFO growth while VTLE is negative at -15.69%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-0.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 10.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-83.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -1335.08%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
3013.64%
Purchases growth of 3013.64% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-91.24%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.68%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. VTLE's 18392.98%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-43.80%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 212.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while VTLE is negative at -315.79%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.