40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
142.24%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -8772.77%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.31%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 6.95%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2466.67%
Some yoy growth while VTLE is negative at -9795.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-13.64%
Negative yoy SBC while VTLE is 47.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
183.80%
Well above VTLE's 172.02% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.80%
Growth well above VTLE's 235.09%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-12.28%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -44.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-18.66%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -12.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-9.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -21.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-2816.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 27.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-112.13%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1373.68%
Liquidation growth of 1373.68% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-52.56%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 22.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-233.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -18.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
68.51%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of VTLE's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.