40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
907.47%
Net income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 541.33%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
19.00%
D&A growth well above VTLE's 20.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
63.96%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 541.28%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-123.68%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VTLE at -3.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
30.25%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -1.49%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.25%
Some yoy usage while VTLE is negative at -123.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-196.00%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -245.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-9.26%
Negative yoy CFO while VTLE is 21.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-6.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -113.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
740.95%
Some acquisitions while VTLE is negative at -121.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
1064.52%
Purchases growth of 1064.52% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-79.82%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
37.16%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. VTLE's 213.07%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
355.54%
We have mild expansions while VTLE is negative at -113.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
92.80%
Debt repayment growth of 92.80% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.