40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.23%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -113.53%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-10.66%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VTLE at -7.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
36.21%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VTLE's 118.60%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-350.00%
Negative yoy SBC while VTLE is 9.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-9.09%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VTLE is 726.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.09%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-151.72%
Negative yoy while VTLE is 31.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
52.01%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VTLE's 27.17%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
36.34%
CapEx growth well above VTLE's 19.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-29.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-40.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-36.34%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
32.43%
Growth of 32.43% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
20.12%
Investing outflow well above VTLE's 30.50%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
98.86%
Debt repayment similar to VTLE's 98.26%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.