40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
253.38%
Net income growth at 50-75% of VTLE's 470.64%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
1.63%
Some D&A expansion while VTLE is negative at -9.10%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-50.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 9.10%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-48.89%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VTLE at -4.58%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-73.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -504.19%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
202.94%
AR growth well above VTLE's 241.67%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -330.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-97.87%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -98.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-46.73%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -42.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-13.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -12.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-637.50%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
714.29%
Purchases growth of 714.29% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-84.42%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-32.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 1862.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-57.96%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 50.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
5.88%
We repay more while VTLE is negative at -120.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.