40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-55.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VTLE at -252.63%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.44%
D&A growth well above VTLE's 0.65%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.15%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
105.88%
SBC growth while VTLE is negative at -311.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -293.28%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
207.02%
AR growth while VTLE is negative at -118.63%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-172.73%
Negative yoy usage while VTLE is 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
29.17%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. VTLE's 7011.42%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-16.56%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -42.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.53%
CapEx growth well above VTLE's 38.15%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
1073.33%
Acquisition growth of 1073.33% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-373.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-373.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while VTLE is 561.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
29.31%
Investing outflow well above VTLE's 42.04%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
91.75%
We repay more while VTLE is negative at -42.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.56%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of VTLE's 88.24%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.