40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
65.30%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 56.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-17.65%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 0.91%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-114.24%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 66.57%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while VTLE is 20.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
219.33%
Slight usage while VTLE is negative at -265.22%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-13.33%
AR is negative yoy while VTLE is 36.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.33%
Some yoy usage while VTLE is negative at -3230.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
321.37%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VTLE's 64.68%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-39.29%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 65.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
442.86%
Acquisition growth of 442.86% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
229.04%
Purchases growth of 229.04% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-73.02%
We reduce yoy sales while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-39.29%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -24.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
52.61%
Investing outflow well above VTLE's 65.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-383.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.