PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
150.33%
Net income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 54.54%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-23.19%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 2.04%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-66.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
33.33%
SBC growth while VTLE is negative at -1.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-272.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -268.38%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-16.08%
AR is negative yoy while VTLE is 2.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-154.55%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -261.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-48.72%
Both negative yoy, with VTLE at -36.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
15.02%
Some CFO growth while VTLE is negative at -35.18%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-2.04%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 16.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-95.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.58%
Growth well above VTLE's 98.95%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
28.19%
Investing outflow well above VTLE's 16.94%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-590.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 5.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.