PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-117.41%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VTLE at -140.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.65%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 35.74%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-300.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-34.78%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VTLE at -0.63%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-2135.29%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -154.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1001.95%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VTLE at -111.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
141.16%
A yoy AP increase while VTLE is negative at -81.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-2135.29%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -37.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
33766.67%
Well above VTLE's 572.23%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-7.43%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -18.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-7.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while VTLE is 44.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-1293.71%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Growth of 200.00% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-2.96%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 45.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-6900.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VTLE is 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.69%
Buyback growth of 35.69% while VTLE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.