40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.56%
Some net income increase while VTLE is negative at -64.97%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-3.78%
Negative yoy D&A while VTLE is 5.36%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-355.68%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VTLE stands at 160.72%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
10.87%
SBC growth while VTLE is negative at -18.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-116.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -628.84%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-88.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VTLE at -95.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
141.64%
Inventory growth well above VTLE's 30.64%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
80.58%
A yoy AP increase while VTLE is negative at -30.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-116.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VTLE at -19.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-4.71%
Negative yoy while VTLE is 126.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.04%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VTLE at -40.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
29.94%
CapEx growth well above VTLE's 8.95%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-219.25%
Negative yoy acquisition while VTLE stands at 11804.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with VTLE at -79.29%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-123.86%
We reduce yoy invests while VTLE stands at 78.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.81%
Debt repayment above 1.5x VTLE's 38.52%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.15%
Similar buyback growth to VTLE's 38.89%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.